S Corp Owners Must Pay Reasonable Salary Before Taking Distributions
Accounting expert David Riggs outlines IRS rules on S corp owner compensation, explaining how salary decisions affect payroll taxes and require documentation.
S corporation owners who also work in their businesses cannot simply take shareholder distributions without first drawing a reasonable salary, according to guidance from accounting expert David Riggs published in HelloNation. The distinction carries significant tax consequences, as distributions are not subject to payroll taxes while wages are, creating an incentive the IRS actively scrutinizes.
Riggs explains that determining what qualifies as reasonable compensation is not arbitrary. Factors including the owner's specific job duties, professional experience, hours worked, and what comparable businesses pay for similar roles all feed into a defensible salary figure. Without a structured rationale, S corp owners risk IRS reclassification of distributions as wages, which can trigger back payroll taxes, penalties, and interest.
Read more Independent Wealth Management Evolves With Fiduciary Focus →
Documentation is a central theme in Riggs' analysis. Owners who cannot produce supporting records justifying their salary decisions are particularly vulnerable during an audit. Maintaining contemporaneous records — such as job descriptions, industry compensation surveys, and meeting minutes — strengthens a company's position if the IRS challenges the compensation structure.
The strategic tension for S corp owners lies in balancing legitimate tax savings through distributions against the legal requirement to compensate themselves fairly for services rendered. Underpaying salary to maximize distributions is one of the more commonly flagged red flags in small-business tax enforcement, making professional guidance especially valuable for owners navigating this area.
Continue reading at All Financial Services & Investing.
